Home Technical information

TECHNICAL INFORMATION

Repeatable impacts.
Recorded responses.

The device specification, recorded outputs and practical testing process, with an illustration of how changing the drop height changes the input.

EXPLORE A DROP HEIGHTILLUSTRATION
IDEAL IMPACT SPEED3.13 m/s
GRAVITATIONAL ENERGY30.17 J

Ideal free fall using m = 6.15 kg and g = 9.81 m/s². These are calculations, not measured surface response or cushioning.

DEVICE SPECIFICATION

Portable hardware.
Detailed output.

The sphere is dropped onto turf or other sports surfaces to examine mechanical response. The original device description uses around 15 drops per location across varied heights and nearby spots; project protocols can prescribe a different series.

The LED bar helps the operator cover the planned drop range and measurements. Data are recorded for subsequent analysis.

Sphere mass
6.15 kg
Sphere diameter
20.4 cm
Drop-height capability
From 5 cm to more than 80 cm
Data storage
Formatted microSD card; CSV files
Operator feedback
Colour LED status bar
Battery
Rechargeable 1000 mAh LiPo
Operating time
Approximately 6 hours of continuous use

RECORDED PARAMETERS

What the electronics record.

Device outputs retained from the original technical description.
ParameterWhat it describesUnit / interpretation
Impact velocityThe recorded speed of the sphere at impact.m/s
Gmax / firmnessPeak acceleration during the impact response.g
Stiffness / spring rateResistance to deformation under the testing conditions.Protocol-defined
Penetration depthThe sphere’s penetration or deformation response.mm
Energy restitutionThe rebound response following impact.% / coefficient
Resonance frequencyA recorded dynamic response property.Frequency
E-modulusA calculated material-response property from the device output.Protocol-defined

Derived measures and interpretation bands depend on the research model and protocol. A drop-height calculation does not predict peak force, cushioning or a horse’s response.

FROM CSV TO INTERPRETATION

The protocol
makes comparisons useful.

Drop heights, repeats, station spacing and instrument combinations are defined for the project. Recorded impact conditions allow readings to be compared within that design.

GPS-linked locations support mapping. Separate moisture measurements add context, while repeated visits can help distinguish variation across the course from changes over time.

Research protocols can combine the VST, moisture meters and GoingStick measurements. Those instruments describe different outcomes; they are considered together rather than treated as interchangeable.

How the data become reports →
Close view of the VST electronics, handle and sphere
The same instrument, interpreted through an agreed sampling protocol.

NEXT STEP

Need a particular testing protocol?

Tell us the surface, questions and measurements your project requires.

Start a conversation